Endurance already in place
59 mL/kg/minSpiroFit VO₂ max and lactate LT2 at 4:00/km confirmed a strong base. INSCYD added a modelled metabolic profile.

HYROX / FITNESS PROFILING
38 years · 76 kg · Men’s Open scenario · Five training days · 12-week block
A 3:02 marathon suggested a strong endurance base. Yet a controlled kilometre slowed from 4:10 when fresh to 5:20 after a station circuit. In a full HYROX-style simulation, repeated stations made the running progressively harder.
The goalCarry running ability through the stations and complete the same full simulation in under 1:30.
Worked examples. Athlete details, measurements and results are simulated to demonstrate how profiling informs training.
WHAT THE PROFILE REVEALED
The aerobic base was strong. The bigger opportunity was to improve force capacity, manage station intensity and practise settling back into a sustainable run with tired legs.
01 / MEASURE
Read the measures together, in the context of the athlete’s goal.
SpiroFit VO₂ max and lactate LT2 at 4:00/km confirmed a strong base. INSCYD added a modelled metabolic profile.
VALD jump height fell from 33 to 25 cm after the circuit. Ochy contact time increased from 238 to 276 ms at a fixed running pace.
Train.Red measured local muscle-oxygen recovery. Blood lactate remained at 6.7 mmol/L five minutes after the circuit.
Sweat analysis estimated 1,100 mg sodium/L in the test conditions, informing a practised, tolerable hydration plan.
SpiroFit · INSCYD · Blood lactate · VALD ForceDecks & DynaMo · Ochy · Train.Red · Sweat analysis
02 / APPLY
A focused block, with a clear purpose behind each change.
Once weekly, alternate controlled station work with short runs. Keep the first running minutes deliberate.
Training stimulusDevelop the ability to recover while moving and avoid an unsustainable restart.
Use progressive lower-body strength twice weekly, plus technically controlled sled and lunge practice.
Training stimulusMake station demands more manageable and retain force afterwards.
Retain easy endurance work. Practise station pacing, transitions, fuelling and drinking in longer specific sessions.
Training stimulusBring the existing running ability into the event without adding unnecessary fatigue.
03 / REVIEW
Results after 12 weeks. Reassessment follows the original question.
THE CHANGE WE TRACKED
Time for 1 km after the same station circuit
| Measure | Baseline | Week 12 |
|---|---|---|
| Total simulation time | 1:34:30 | 1:26:40 |
| Combined eight 1 km runs | 39:20 | 35:40 |
| Jump-height loss after circuit | 24.2% | 11.4% |
| Local muscle-oxygen recovery | 78 s | 50 s |
The programme preserved endurance while addressing station demands and recovery. Better running, station execution and transitions all contributed to the result.
These examples show a combined training response, not proof that a particular test caused an improvement. The full case study explains the protocols, model estimates and measurement limitations. The assessments and follow-up span several visits.
MAKE IT RELEVANT TO YOU
Tell us your goal, current results and training context. We’ll agree the assessments that can help you decide what to work on.
Plan my assessmentEight pages of findings, graphics, training detail and supporting methods.
Open HYROX PDF (opens in a new tab)A DIFFERENT PERFORMANCE QUESTION
Running
A 35-minute 10K runner who fades in the half marathon. The priority: durability, strength and fuelling.
Cycling
A rider preparing for a hilly 160 km sportive, with good fresh power but a big drop after two and a half hours.